Fantasy Football Experts

 

 

InsiderExtra PointsFantasy Football Experts RadioTeam Power RatingsFantasy Football ResourcesHome

Home
FFEx Insider
NFL Draft

 
 
 

By Daryl Davis
September 29, 2007
Also See: 

After three weeks, your RB corps is like a stalled-out car on a freezing Boston morning in January.  Fortunately for you, it’s only September, and there is plenty of time left in the fantasy season.  The younger of the Davis duo has the ignominious distinction of being a huge Kansas Jayhawk basketball fan.  Many programs would kill to be the No. 1 ranked NCAA team in December.  But we Jayhawk fans have touted our early season records far too often, only to be ousted from the championship tournament by 8 and 9 seeds.  (Yes, I’m ignoring that loss to 14th-seeded Bucknell in 2005…please, please, just let me ignore it!)

My point is fairly simple: Fantasy Football is a crazy game, and it ain’t over until…well, until it’s over.   

If your losses are piling up due to weak RBs, fear not.  In most leagues, the team with the worst record has dibs on the waiver wire.  This arrangement effectively turns your disadvantage (a weak running back corps that makes you lose) into an advantage (the opportunity to improve your running back corps dramatically and win) as long as you keep the following facts and tendencies in mind: 

bullet

Fact #1:  RBs will go down with injuries in 2007;

bullet

Fact #2:  Those RBs will be out either short or long term, and their replacements will be more valuable the longer they are out; and

bullet

Fact #3:  Their teams still have to function without them, so no matter how unpromising a backup may appear to be, that backup will be somewhat productive. 
 

bullet

Tendency #1: People notice when a star (such as Shaun Alexander) goes down, and people pay immediate attention to the backups of such stars (such as Maurice Morris).

bullet

Tendency #2: People tend to look at backups through the lens of where they saw them last (on another pro team or in college) and do not focus adequately on the current situation of the backup.   
 

bullet

Consequence: Backups of stellar RBs will be consistently overvalued as compared to backups of less celebrated players.  

I can see you doubting my conclusion already.  You are thinking about Priest Holmes being a top RB in 2003 and the success that Larry Johnson enjoyed as his replacement in 2004.  You are extrapolating from that one phenomenal transition that other equally phenomenal transitions are the norm rather than the exception, but a closer look at recent history should disabuse you of that notion.  Try to focus less on an awe-inspiring Johnson as a backup to an awe-inspiring Holmes in 2004 and more about unheralded Mewelde Moore as a backup to the less-than-stellar Chester Taylor for a 3-week period in 2004 or journeyman Sammy Morris filling in for a barely adequate Ronnie Brown for 3 weeks at the end of the 2006 season.   

We know now who the top 7 running backs in 2006 were:  LaDainian Tomlinson, Steven Jackson, Larry Johnson, Brian Westbrook, Frank Gore, Tiki Barber, and Willie Parker.  Baber has retired, but the other 6 are still active and highly valued.  If and when these guys go down in 2007 (Jackson is already out for 2-3 weeks), their replacements are sure to be pounced upon in leagues all over the world.  But if we look back at how such a strategy would have panned out in years past, then we can see that relying on Tomlinsons and Alexanders to go down so that the Michael Turners and Maurice Morrises of the world can thrive is no way to ensure success in playing the backup RB market.   

2001-2002

In 2001, the top seven fantasy RBs were:  Marshall Faulk, Holmes, Ahman Green, Alexander, Curtis Martin, Corey Dillon, and Ricky Williams.  In 2002, Faulk missed two games, and Lamar Gordon filled in admirably, scoring 20 and 13 fantasy points (using a fairly common scoring system).  Holmes also missed 2 games, but the productivity of his replacements (Mike Cloud, Derrick Blaylock, and Omar Easy) is hardly worth mentioning.  Green also missed 2 games in ’02.  In Week 3, Najeh Davenport supported the Packers with 13 points, while Tony Fisher offered 19 points in Week 14.  Alexander, Martin, Dillon, and Williams started all 16 games.   

Lesson: Of 102 possible starts in 2002 for the 7 best RBs in 2001, there were 96 starts.  That’s a 94% start rate—probably a good deal higher than most people would have estimated.  Green’s missed starts weren’t even in back-to-back contests, and his primary backup in Week 3 wasn’t the same as his primary backup in Week 14.  If you focused only on backups to star RBs in 2002, you limited yourself severely.   

2002-2003

In 2002, the top seven RBs were:  Holmes, Williams, LaDainian Tomlinson, Charlie Garner, Clinton Portis, Dillon, and Deuce McAllister.  Holmes, Williams and Tomlinson started all 16 games in ’03.  Garner was phased out of the offense, albeit slowly.  While Tyrone Wheatley performed “ok,” Garner only missed two starts in ’03, and Wheatley scored 18 and 4.  Portis missed three games in ’03, and Mike Anderson and Quentin Griffin filled in with mediocre numbers.  McAllister missed just one start and was spelled by James Fenderson to the tune of 9 points.  Dillon, on the other hand, began losing starts—due to a not-so-critical injury—to Rudi Johnson.  Johnson started five games that season and scored 15, 21, 34, 21 and 35.  Dillon was promptly sent packing to New England.  

Lesson: Those who grabbed Rudi Johnson in 2003 should be delighted that they did, but it would be difficult for them to argue that they knew that he would end up wresting the job from Dillon.  For a few years, everyone was certain that LaMont Jordan would win the starting job with the Jets from Curtis Martin.  Jordan didn’t become a legit starter until he moved to Oakland.  One has to consider the talent of the backup in the complicated context of the team he plays for, the talent of the other backups, and the injury status of the starter.  Those who grabbed the backups for Williams, Tomlinson, and Holmes in 2003 spent the whole season waiting to use them.   

2003-2004

In 2003, the top seven RBs were:  Tomlinson, Holmes, Green, Jamal Lewis, Portis, McAllister, and Alexander.  In ’03 Tomlinson failed to start in only one game, and that was when he was rested in Week 17, and the Chargers tested out Michael Turner and Andrew Pinnock for the playoffs, with no notable production.  Holmes started the first eight games, and we all know what happened next:  Johnson laid a definite claim to that starting spot.  Green missed one start, which opened the door for Davenport to score a whopping 31 points.  Lewis missed four games, and Chester Taylor filled in impressively with 11, 8, 10 and 24 point performances.  Portis was also benched in Week 17, and Ladell Betts filled in nicely with 19 points.  McAllister missed two starts, and Aaron Stecker filled in nicely with 26 and 9 points.  Alexander didn’t miss a start. 

Lesson: The Larry Johnson of 2004 isn’t really relevant to a discussion of running backs one can realistically expect to pick up on waivers due to injury in 2006.  He was so highly touted in the fantasy community (and there were so many doubts about Holmes’ health going into the season) that he was drafted relatively high.  Focus on the other backups, since they have analogues in the 2006 season.  Notice that Tomlinson’s blue chip backup (Turner) was less valuable than the blue collar backups on other teams (Davenport, Taylor, Stecker, and Betts).   

2004-2005

In 2004, the top seven RBs were:  Barber, Alexander, Tomlinson, Martin, Edgerrin James, Domanick Davis, and Dillon.  Barber, Alexander and Tomlinson started all 16 games in ’05.  After struggling the first 12 games of the season, Martin yielded his starting job to Cedric Houston, who scored a respectable 12, 11, 3 and 11 points to close out the season.  James was benched—along with everyone else of importance on the Colts—in Week 17…nothing to note.  Davis missed five starts.  Jonathan Wells started four of those weeks, offering a very impressive 17, 15, 20 and 14 points, while Vernand Morency filled in the fifth week with 19 points.  

Lesson: Davis was a talented back whose career was brutally cut short by injury, but even his fans would have a difficult time putting him in the same category as Martin.  Their injuries in 2005 clearly illustrate the wrongheadedness of concluding that the backup to a superstar is more desirable than the backup to a lesser back, as the best performances by Martin’s backup (Houston) were all inferior to the worst performances by Davis’ backups (Wells and Morency).   

2005-2006

In 2005, the top seven RBs were: Alexander, Larry Johnson, Barber, Tomlinson, James, Portis, and Jordan.  Alexander missed six games in the middle of ’06, and his replacement, Morris, scored 5, 6, 7, 3, 16 and 15.  Johnson, Barber, Tomlinson and James started all 16 games.  Portis missed half the season, and Betts offered 12, 5, 14, 26, 22, 20, 27 and 20 as a starter.  Jordan missed seven starts, and Justin Fargas offered 7, 6, 11, 5, 7, 10 and 10 points. 

Lesson: The Alexander-Morris shift in Seattle was not at all akin to the Holmes-Johnson shift in KC two years earlier.  We won’t know how a Tomlinson-Turner shift will work out until Tomlinson gets hurt for an extended period, but those who think that it is the “norm” for star running backs to be capably replaced by their backups are perhaps deluding themselves.   

The upshot of all this is not that you should disregard injuries to stars such as Westbrook, Jackson, and Rudi Johnson.  Of course you should pay attention to such injuries.  But you will do well to pay even closer attention to injuries to the likes of Brandon Jacobs and Cadillac Williams

 

 

 

 

 
  
 

Fantasy Football Experts - A BTG Sports Services Website